The exception that proves the rule

Hear's an interesting graphic.

click on graphic to enlarge

The correlation is supposed to be between wealth and performance, but Olentangy is the obvious exception to this rule. Second on wealth, yet 79th on performance. Something is very wrong with these results.

Or, should we spin the results, claim reverse causation, and pride ourselves with earning a lot despite the district's scores? That's it ... there's nothing like a positive spin ...