Sunday, July 19, 2009

 

FFF and Jefferson

From a recent edition of the Email Update from the Future of Freedom Foundation:

Thursday, July 16, 2009
If once the people become inattentive to the public affairs, you and I, and Congress and Assemblies, Judges and Governors, shall all become wolves. It seems to be the law of our general nature, in spite of individual exceptions; and experience declares that man is the only animal which devours his own kind; for I can apply no milder term to the governments of Europe, and to the general prey of the rich on the poor.
— Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington [1787]


 

Wade Lucas: feeding the pilot fish

Not only are the taxpayers stuck with Wade McLucas, now we have to endure his pilot fish (his minions from Green Local), all in a frenzy for whatever scraps ... er, dollars ... the shark (Ol' Wade) has left in your wallet.


Wade gets to spread it around because the board just loves to spend your money.

By the way, I believe that Wade calls these new hires "the kids." 'Cause you know every dollar is spent for the kids.

 

Thought Control: already in your schools

And you'll pay for it and be happy.

Folks, this nonsense is pushed by the Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development in its Educational Leadership, a widely read educationist magazine that drives the agenda in all public schools and most private schools. And, yes, your Olentangy administrators and teachers subscribe to both the magazine and its agenda.

How can people readily accept such thought control without even a whimper? Has the state and its minions -- the education monopoly -- beaten us in the battle of ideology, and the battle for our children and posterity?

Don't ever say it was done to us. Our epitath is thus: We did it to ourselves.


From the July edition of Educational Leadership -- You can sense where this nonsense is going. -- Jim

4. Arrange "Concern Meetings"
During a concern meeting, a counselor and two or more peers privately confront a student who has fallen down academically or behaviorally, expressing concern and probing for how that student might do better and what supports the student may need. The choice of peers in a concern meeting is crucial. If the erring student does not perceive all participants as caring friends, there is a good chance that this student will experience the peer pressure during the meeting as harmful rather than helpful. When the confronted student believes the confronters are on his or her side, however, that student can make remarkable changes.At Hyde Leadership Public Charter School in Washington, D.C. (a National School of Character finalist), several educators and four students held a concern meeting with an 11th grade girl whose grades had taken a downturn and who was speaking disrespectfully to teachers. The girl first blamed the teacher present for not being fair, but one of the boys said softly, "I think you're pointing the finger at other people. I've done that myself. The sooner you address this as your problem, the sooner you'll solve it." Another student told her, "I've been where you are. Last year I got myself into a similar predicament because of my attitude. But I've known you for a long time. I know your work ethic. I know you're much better than this."

By the meeting's end, the girl's defensiveness was gone. There were some tears, and her four peers spontaneously hugged her. With the dean's encouragement, she made goals for her coursework and community service and set a time to check in with the group and report on how her plan was working


Friday, July 17, 2009

 

Olentangy Administrators: Taking Care of Themselves

The Olentangy district administrators are really looking out for themselves in this economic downturn. While the masses are happy to even have a job, the district elite asked for a 2.8% raise -- all for the kids, you know.

The sycophantic board majority approved. Why not? It's just family helping family in trying times.

In other district news, the transportation department is spending federal funds (our tax dollars, once again) to study why some elementary students do not ride bikes or walk to school.

Hmmm. Save the tax dollars and ask a few parents to find the reason (hint: It's because parents want to drive their young children to school.).

And the district takes pride in spending money on such nonsense. Amazing.

 

Powell's Dan Wiencek wants more taxes

Powell City Council member Dan Wiencek wants to stick it to Powell residents. I believe Wiencek was heard muttering, "Let them eat cake."

Wiencek is just the latest politician looking to fund pet projects, with your tax dollars. Amazing.

 

Delaware County: hiding from the sunshine

Seems the folks in Delaware County are hiding something (something big?).

Debi Henthorn wants to get to the bottom of the mess -- literally. So she made a public records request and was met by a brick wall.

Folks, keep in mind that Lisa Iannotta is paid by the the public. But it appears that she is working for the machine.

Ask yourself this question: What do Hanks and Thompson have to hide? Why does the sunshine scare them so?

According to Debi:


Dave Cannon called me Friday July 10, 2009 in regard to my June 18th, records request. I had a 2 o'clock appointment to view those 500+ records today and ended up in a room with Kyle Rohrer, Lisa Iannotta both attorneys and Dave Canon. I was not permitted to view them. I was told Todd Hanks and Tommy Thompson have no records. I asked about the phone calls address in Hanks and Comstocks ( 9 emails) I was told Tommy made and received those calls at home and there are no records. Ken O'Brien is the only one of the commissioner that maintains files and he's been left out of the loop. I asked O'Brien if he had seen Todd's and Gus's emails, he had Not seen any of them. Things in Delaware County Government are very strange and smells really
bad.


The response from the machine is below. Another example of your Delaware County tax dollars at work -- at work against you, that is.

From: "Iannotta, Lisa"
Date: July
9, 2009 5:33:47 PM EDT
To: [Debi Henthorn]
Cc: "Cannon, Dave" , "Rohrer, Kyle"
Subject: Emails


Ms. Henthorn,

Mr. Cannon has indicated that you are requesting emails be sent to you now that are
responsive to your records request. Per my last email to you, I am working off of your June 25 request since it is more specific and geared toward ST ege.

Please be advised that some of these I have hard copies of and will scan and send; the others, as I mentioned on the phone, number less than 10. I will forward those to you this evening.

Those are the only ones I have at this time. I received two large files late yesterday, approximately 500 pages, that are still undergoing a review, including a legal review, to determine if they are responsive to your request and can be released. As soon as that review is complete, I will let you know.

If you have questions, please feel free to contact me.

Thank you,
Lisa Iannotta
Director of
Administrative Services
740-833-2125


Thursday, July 16, 2009

 

Socialism: the debate continues

A recent post of mine over on the Blog at Mises.org:









Socialism: the debate continues

Jim Fedako



"But this immediately destroys Mises' argument against socialism."

Over at zloj's Motley Fool CAPS blog, the haunting spectre rises once again.


Wednesday, July 15, 2009

 

Jefferson Predicts America in 2009

From our friends over Freedom Watch:
Jefferson Predicts America in 2009

“If we run into debts, as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our callings and our creeds, as the people of England are, our people, like them, must come to labor sixteen hours in the twenty-four, give the earnings of fifteen of these to the government for their debts and daily expenses; and the sixteenth being insufficient to afford us bread, we must live, as they do now, on oatmeal and potatoes; have no time to think, no means of calling the mismanagers to account; but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves out to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers.”

(Jefferson to Samuel Kerchival, March, 1816)

(The Jeffersonian Cyclopedia, Funk & Wagnalls Company, 1900, pp. 234-235)

FREEDOM WATCH is information pertaining to
government abuse of power, trashing of
the Constitution, illegal immigration,
2nd Amendment, political correctness
run amok, etc.
It is FREE and sent to you via E-mail.
To subscribe send an e-mail to:
FreedomWatch-subscribe@topica.com

FREEDOM WATCH
http://fwatch.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

 

Todd Hanks starring in The Big Idea

To the best of my knowledge, Todd Hanks has never created one job -- being a political hack and all. Yet ...

According to ThisWeekNews, "Hanks and ST eGe officials contend the project could create up to 3,000 jobs and bring in non-tax revenue for the county of more than $100-million annually once it is operational. He and other county officials immediately began looking at funding sources after the June 22 meeting, including federal grants."

Got that? Hanks is going to create 3,000 jobs in Delaware County ... 3,000 jobs. And he is going to do it with your tax dollars.

Hanks is a man of small ideas. So where did he come up with such a big project -- such a big idea? Maybe his friends think big for him.

The question to ask is this: What's in it for Hanks? (Might be time to check his friends and family plan.)

 

A proposal from the American Family Roundtable

The American Family Roundtable is an Ohio-based organization that is terrified of socialized medicine -- and with good reason. AFR recently created Move Out Congress in order to send the bozos in Washington -- on both sides of the aisle -- back home.

I agree with AFR. We are being led down the
road to serfdom by those elected to protect our property FROM government.


Pink Slip Congress - Today

It's time for them to come home. They spend money we don't have. They pass bills without reading them. They watch as thousands of innocent people are thrown out of work for no just cause and businesses are destroyed. They are conspiring to take over your healthcare and strip you of your choices. They have abandoned the principles of the Declaration and Constitution and cast aside the rule of law.

So why should they claim to be representing you?

We are sending every member their Termination Notice. It's time to let them know we are finished. It's time for them to come home. You can
download this pdf file, print it and send copies to the local district office of your Representative and Senator.

Then
copy and paste the pink slip text into an email and send it to the DC offices of your Representative and Senators. You can find their contact information here on this site.Or you can call the Congressional Switchboard at 202.224.3121 and ask for your House Member and Senators. Ask each office for an email address and fax number for your Members.

So you send hard copies to the local district offices and email copies to Washington D.C. Hold onto this contact information for future emails, faxes and mailings you will want to send in the coming
months ahead.

Contact information for your members of Congress is right here.

Then call the local office and the DC office and ask them if they got their
Termination Notice. If not, ask them for their fax number and send them another copy. They'll get the message.

More Messages to Congress

We will be sending more messages to Congress in the coming weeks. Stay tuned for downloads on how to send more important information like: Moving Companies they should contact, Resume Services, Move-out checklists, etc.


Monday, July 13, 2009

 

A timely repost

For those desiring early-warning sirens in Delaware county, consider an older post of mine over at the Blog at Mises.org.









Mom or government?

It's tornado season here in Ohio.

This afternoon as a few funnel clouds were forming miles from my house, I received a call from my mother living in Florida. Seems she was not about to wait for her son to make his yearly Mother's Day call as she had urgent news. CNN and other news outlets were reporting funnel clouds and tornados in Central Ohio, with my county noted as a likely target. This was sometime before 2:00. I turned on the TV and hit the web for detailed updates. Luckily, the storms passed overhead without even a significant touchdown.

With the menace long gone, I received another phone call; an automated call from the county 911 department notifying me of the tornado warning. This was 2:25, with the warning to expire at 2:30. And, more importantly, with the storms no longer in the county, or even a threat to adjoining counties.

Then I learned that Franklin County -- just to my south -- also had a delayed tornado warning because "Franklin County EMA deputy director Jim Leonard said the communications room is not manned during weekends and holidays, but there are two people on-call at all times."

Do I complain to management? No way. Those folks are looking for complaints as a means to justify additional funding. Do I keep my mother happy? You bet! Her warning was neither delayed nor costly.

Remember mom, and not just on Mother's Day.


 

A great news source

Go to DAWN.com and subscribe to the DAWN Internet News Alert. According to DAWN, DINA is "a free daily news-service from Pakistan's largest English language newspaper, the Daily DAWN."

In my view, DINA provides a great window into India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, etc. It's a great read -- though I do not get around to reading it daily.

But whenever politics heats up in that region, I turn to DINA for the local report (biased, for sure -- what reporting is not biased?).

Sunday, July 12, 2009

 

Arguing your way to an appointment

One minute Charlotte Joseph is defending the majority of Delaware's county commissioners, the next she is being appointed to the county’s port authority. Just dumb luck, I suppose.

Saturday, July 11, 2009

 

Tommy Thompson plays the terrorist card

You just have to love the likes of Thompson. He wants a new tax, so he plays the terrorist card.

According to The Delaware Gazette, "Commissioner Tommy Thompson said the likelihood for terrorist attacks has risen since the events of 9/11."

Wait. Hasn't Homeland Security and the endless war provided security? Hmmm. Where have those trillions gone? Whose pocket got fatter at our expense. I digress.

Thompson wants a new tax -- he's a Republican who likes government, big government. And the rest of the county elected Republicans are falling in line.

Again, according to the Gazette, "Berlin Township Trustee Phil Panzarella said the nearly 3 million annual visitors to the Alum Creek State Park wouldn’t receive reverse 911 calls the county currently uses to warn residents."

I've been to the park and have never seen those 3 million on any given day. Talk about aggregation for effect.1

The lone voice of Earl Long speaks reason in the county. Of course, he is not one of the elected elite.

Thompson should confine his efforts to reviewing ditches. We'd all be better off.



Notes:

1. Consider that I visit the park 50 or more times per year, always packing my cell phone. Add in my family and you quickly see how an annual number is for effect only.

Monday, July 06, 2009

 

Petty Officials Deceiving the Masses

"Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise. For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness. And again, The Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain.

1 Corinthians 3:18-20"


According to the The Delaware Gazette, "Gus Comstock is a busy man." And according to the Bible, he's also a vain man.

Now, Gus is a nice guy. He really is. But he is not omniscient by any means -- no one is (reread the passage above for proof).

Gus thinks that he and Delaware's other petty officials can guide the county into the future. They are the great planners who can oversee the evil, profit-seeking entrepreneurs. They are the altruistic government leading us to a bright utopia, dragging the entrepreneurs by the ear.

"But, if you have a progressive, activist, robust government that wants to be involved, you can make sure that these projects are best serving the citizens of the community."

A progressive, activist, robust government is the bane of mankind. Yet Gus wants to push government to the forefront. In fact, he wants government to lead. That comment could be attributed to just about any totalitarian government. It is almost as if Gus doesn't even know that his statements belie thoughts that are antithetical to freedom -- thoughts that are antithetical to the best interests of the county resident.

"We need to make sure the latest technology is being deployed to Delaware County because companies demand that."

Of course they do. Companies want tax dollars to support their projects. Just look at the bozos from ST eGe to see the lengths many investors will go in order to secure governmental funding. But just because they do it, that doesn't make it right.

"I think if we get that designed properly, there’s some opportunity for some manufacturing growth, some office space and some retail. It would be a nice mix."

A good mix for whom? For Gus? For his business friends (those who keep his phone constantly ringing)? For county residents? Is ol' Gus so smart that he can satisfy everyone? Well, he is vain enough to think so.

Our future is decided by either entrepreneurs looking to profit by providing for the wants of the consumer. Or it is decided by those like Gus who think a little to highly of themselves. There is no other third way.


note: Ah, yes, the non sequitur. How can the evil businessman ringing Gus suddenly become the good businessman willing to do whatever it takes to satisfy the needs of the consumer? The answer is simple: When government officials -- like Gus, and Hanks and Thompson -- seek to provide goodies for business, they (the officials) are the drug pushers working to hook businessmen into lives of dependency.

Sunday, July 05, 2009

 

An Ethical Penumbra

A timely repost. -- Jim

Ludwig von Mises Institute blog post by Jim Fedako

penumbra.gif
I love the word penumbra -- the shaded area between light and dark . The word has a wonderful ring. Let me propose a matter that is (to me) an ethical penumbra.

The article below came out of a discussion with a next door neighbor who was livid that backyard fireworks were going off about 10 houses away. We (my family) thought it was great since we didn't have to travel for what turned out to be dueling fireworks displays. We (my family again) discussed our neighbor's view and his possible actions.

While I do not like the state, I could not find fault with someone wanting to protect his property (he never called, just paced back in forth in a lather).

So, here is the ethical penumbra: When is it OK to use the state in defense of property? The issue is not my neighbor as his property was far from the fireworks. The issue is other property owners in closer proximity to falling debris.


Don't be a Libertarian Tattletale

What is the difference between tattling and telling? As a father, I know that tattling is something that needs to be addressed every so often. My rule - not subject to debate - is that tattling occurs when one of my children attempts to use the family apparatus of coercion and compulsion (me) in order to gain an advantage over another. Accordingly, tattling does not occur when the tale revolves around the protection of property or life. Therefore, telling me that my middle son is (say) set to jump from his bedroom window to the trampling below is not tattling, while snickering that another sibling skipped her morning job is. Let's apply the Fedako Rule of Tattling to adult life?

Last year we purchased an
Easy Set pool for use in our backyard. Easy Set pools live up to their name: simply place on level ground, attach the electric pump and filter (included), blow up the outer ring, and then fill with water. With no real effort, you can have a pool that is four feet high and 18 feet in diameter, as well as a summer of family fun for less than a public or private pool membership. That is until the township zoning goons spot your pool and start sending notices for removal or fine.

It is at this point that the collectivist cries, "Those pools are an attractive nuisance, they are dangerous." But the pool is almost five feet high (when you include the inflatable ring), requiring a removable ladder to enter. So, even accepting the collective concept of nuisance - and setting aside my own desire to not see someone else's child harmed, the pools pose no real danger. Certainly no more danger than the trees that sit on my property - gravity being a undeniable and lethal force. Of course, some folks see things differently, and those folks inserted regulations into the zoning code to preclude my enjoyment of backyard fun. That said, pools are not the only way to enjoy the summer in your backyard.

In Ohio, fireworks are legal to buy but illegal to set off. Around the holidays, licensed fireworks distributors open their doors to sell fireworks. The consumers are mostly Ohioans who have filled out a state-mandated form swearing to set off those very same fireworks in some other state. Please, those fireworks are set off in backyards across Ohio.

Certainly, a fireworks display brings enjoyment to the property owner, as well as some (if not all) of his friends and neighbors. However, besides the colors and sounds, fireworks also rain sparks and smoldering debris over adjoining properties, creating real and potential threats to those homeowners.

So, here is the current situation: pools that violate zoning and fireworks that violate state law. Now, back to tattling and telling.

On a family bike ride through our neighborhood, we noticed a few Easy Set pools. My children wanted to know why we could not have ours when some neighbors had theirs. My answer: Zoning, as well as government enforcement in general, is arbitrary at best.

The next question was expected. Should we tell on our neighbors for violating the zoning code? My answer: No, that would be tattling. The reasoning is simple: zoning regulations are a collective theft of property rights. Our only reason for tattling would be to gain an advantage over our neighbors - the power to control their property through the use of the
social apparatus of coercion and compulsion. We can't have our pool, so you can't have yours.

Hey, if these folks can get away with a small act of civil disobedience, the more power to them. They have not aggressed against my property nor violated a contract. The state is the aggressor and violator. Besides, I do not want to support the state by acting as its volunteer agent.

What about fireworks? What is the appropriate response in this instance? The answer is a little more complicated since the answer depends on where your property sits relative to the fireworks display.

I have only been an outside observer (literally), watching from a good distance the colors and sounds. If I lived where sparks and debris were falling on my property, I could make the call to the county sheriff. In this instance, I am seeking protection for my property from the cartelized protection racket. This is well within my rights since I would not be using government to gain an advantage over my neighbors (I refer to ethical rights, not legal rights). I would merely be protecting my property from aggression.

Could I call the police in order to protect my neighbor's property in his absence should his property sit beneath the fireworks display? If you have an agreement with your neighbor that includes property protection, call. Additionally, if you truly believe that his property will be damaged, call. Otherwise, if you have no property-based reason for stopping the display, remain silent. It could be that all adjoining property owners have agreed to the risk.

Again, we are not agents of the state who must report every violation of law, or any violation for that matter. We are simply acting men and women who have the right to protect our property from aggression.

Sadly, in Ohio, the police likely will not enforce your fireworks complaint - they will not protect your property. However, they will act as the gun wielding muscle should you ignore the zoning folks and decide to keep your pool.

That settled, let's add a twist: Your neighbor builds a fence that violates the restrictive covenant of your development. Do you have a right to complain and seek action? Absolutely. In this instance, your neighbor violated a contract he freely signed.

Occasionally you read about the so-called patriot who installs the 100-foot flagpole and spot lighting in a neighborhood where the restrictive covenant precludes such a display. The patriot claims that he has a right to show his love of flag and country, "That's what our soldiers fought and died for." This is a perversion of liberty: the belief that the desire to worship the flag supersedes any contract previously signed. Usually the media and sundry statists rush to his defense, making the homeowners association the evil usurper of the right of patriotism. The reality could not be further from the truth.

So, a libertarian can complain and seek action for actual wrongs. -- tell when appropriate, but do not tattle. And never use the state to your advantage.


note: It's true, local police will not enforce fireworks laws. But they have threatened me for drifting through a subdivision intersection while bike riding. The idea being that if I come to a complete stop at every stop sign, no more neighborhood car break-ins or armed home invasions (one occurrence). The state's perverse version of the broken window theory.

Thursday, July 02, 2009

 

They think we are idiots -- and they may be right

Most folks love being ruled by the political class. And being forced to turn on windshield wipers is just another reason to love democracy even more. -- Jim

New Ohio law went into effect today: Headlights must be on when windshield wipers are in use in the rain.

 

Cheating at Government Schools: It's OK when the staff cheats

Steve Castle and team really duped the folks over at New Albany-Plain Local. -- Jim

Castle says officials evaluating use of public resources for '08 levy
Tuesday, June 30, 2009 6:41 PM
By GAIL MARTINEAU

ThisWeek Staff Writer
New Albany-Plain Local Schools Superintendent Steve Castle said any use of his district e-mail account to conduct business for the New Albany for Kids political-action committee was "minimal and inadvertent."

He also said district officials are looking into policies regarding use of district e-mail accounts.

Castle and other school district officials used their district e-mail accounts to conduct business for New Albany for Kids during last November's levy campaign.

District e-mail accounts are taxpayer-funded.

ThisWeek obtained records indicating Castle's use of his New Albany-Plain Local School district e-mail address, scastle@new-albany.k12.oh.us,to conduct levy-campaign business.

According to the Ohio Revised Code section 3315.07, "No board of education shall use public funds to support or oppose the passage of a school levy or bond issue or to compensate any school district employee for time spent on any activity intended to influence the outcome of a school levy or bond issue election."

He sent an e-mail at 5:07 p.m. Nov. 3 -- the eve of election day -- to New Albany for Kids members and to former district communications director Carole Dorn-Bell, district treasurer Brian Ramsay and board members Diane Goedeking and Mike Klein from his gmail account, informing them of the use of AmeriContact, a local calling service, to place "get out the vote" calls on Nov. 3. He also sent the e-mail to his NA-PLS e-mail account and to Ramsay's public e-mail address.

Castle told ThisWeek via e-mail June 23 that his role with NAFK was as a private citizen, not as the superintendent.

"Obviously, a superintendent has a role with all citizen advisory committees, which is a valuable means of having citizen input," he said. "However, there is no doubt that I played a role as a private citizen and, like the majority of those who voted in November, wanted to see the operating issue pass."

He has said the NAFK campaign committee was a citizens advisory committee authorized by the board. NAFK have countered that the committee was entirely separate from the school district.

Castle said he does not think he violated Ohio law by using district e-mail accounts.

"I am aware of the statute. It is the reason why we had separate e-mail accounts, contracts, a committee structure and agreements in the first place," he said.

The separate e-mail account was a gmail account from which the Nov. 3 e-mail originally was sent.

"A separate account was set up and used for campaign purposes," Castle said. "To the extent any campaign use of the district account occurred, it was very minimal and inadvertent and probably occurred in the heat of the last few days of the campaign. We are currently reviewing whether any inadvertent use of district resources took place, reviewing our policies and will address any identified issues."

NA-PLS board members heard an introduction of a new e-mail-use retention policy during their June 22 business meeting. Members are expected to adopt the new policies in July.

Kelly Neer, an assistant campaign-finance administrator with the Ohio Secretary of State's Office, said the issue of legality comes down to the appropriate use of public tax dollars.

He said legality is determined by the time of day a specific situation occurred and whether public equipment, such as a computer, smart phone or e-mail server, was used to conduct PAC business.

Debbie Klug, NAFK treasurer, said that when she received the e-mails, she was more concerned with the fact that Castle had made a decision for the PAC's campaign committee without consulting its members and less concerned about the e-mail account from which his message had come.

Cheri Lehmann, former head of the NAFK campaign committee, agreed.

"We had an understanding of Ohio law, and for that reason, we were not comfortable meeting in the superintendent's conference room and during school hours," she said.

Lehmann said no meetings were held on school grounds during school hours.


 

FFF Quotes

From recent editions of the Email Update from the Future of Freedom Foundation:

Rule by the majority is beneficial only to those who happen to always be in the majority. Otherwise, democracy is no better than any other form of control. -- Jim

Friday, June 19, 2009
There probably are as many persons coerced into acting, not as they want, but as others want, through majority rule as through totalitarian dictatorship.
— John C. Sparks, The Freeman [May 1971]

This is the very same game now played by both sides of the aisle. -- Jim

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Naturally the common people don't want war.... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders.... All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism.
— Hermann Goering


Wednesday, July 01, 2009

 

In Comes the State

A recent article of mine over on the Blog at Mises.org:








In Comes the State
Jim Fedako





Over the past fifteen years, I have seen the state slowly take over my local government, replacing a friendly, ineffective mishmash of neighbors with a professional bureaucracy set apart from its taxpaying masses.

Consider a friend of mine, a man who years ago served as a township trustee. Sure, he received a small salary for the privilege of sitting at the table during twice-monthly meetings — some years even wielding the gavel. However, he also had the privilege of fielding midnight calls — to wake and dress for the grim task of removing a bloodied carcass from a local road.

He had no real power, no real influence, and no real office. The township hall was the backroom of the volunteer fire station — spacious, yet sparse. None of the trappings of power existed in that functional, nondescript building. If you wanted a cup of coffee, you opened the can of generic grounds and brewed a pot yourself.

If you assume that government is essential, this is the government for you: a government where the citizen-statesman rules. Of course, you will always find power-hungry wannabes sneaking around government buildings. But where there is neither power nor money, there are no real favors to give.

It is true that the friend or political ally may have received that extra cup of coffee or benefited from the early snowplow. And those connected may have won the road-salt contract. But none of this really affected me or other township residents.

Since the trustees also held day jobs, they had little time to interfere in our lives. In addition, the township employees were few and ill paid. They too had neither the time nor desire to lord it over us. Sure, there was bickering and politics. However, it was always petty. The township went about its business and we went about ours. Not liberty, but not oppression. A nice middle ground, so to speak.

And whenever a trustee lost his seat at an election, there were heartaches and ill feelings to be sure. But there was also a sense of relief. No more burdensome phone calls. No more evenings away from the family. And more time to attend to productive activities.

The backwaters are not the place for those seeking intrigue; anyone looking for power and trouble heads to the county seat, to the state capital, or to Washington, DC. However, as an area grows — and allows (or encourages) government to grow with it — the flow of power slowly reverses course, sending currents of statism back to once-pastoral regions.

An observer may blame money, especially money from developers looking to profit in a fast-growing area. That is not the case. With development comes the growth of government. And with the growth of government comes the requisite interventions. New zoning standards are adopted, forcing developers into trustees meetings. And so the problems begin.

It is not just zoning; it is planning in general. My sleepy township slowly awoke to an influx of residents, businesses, traffic, etc. Instead of letting acting men and women with property at stake divine the future, many residents clamored for the township to guide the way.

Gradually, a completely new class of politicians began appearing in the township hall. Elections are now debates over various political visions. Instead of the man willing to throw a dead deer in the back of his pickup, the new trustee is the man who has the ability "to inspire change."

No longer are township meetings the place to hear the petty feuds of neighbors. They are now planning sessions where developers swear fealty to the omniscient class seated at the table. Future developments are no longer decided on the farmhouse porch. Developments are now decided in public and private meetings, with exactions and extractions the sought-after rewards for the game played by hosts of rent seekers — on both sides of the table.

Now, trustees believe they know best. As an example, where township residents used to be able to select from a handful of refuse companies, the trustees took it upon themselves to pick one for all of us. And they decided that we all want to recycle — and to pay for it.[1]

You might consider recycling a minor grievance. Nevertheless, it is symptomatic of a subtle turn from government to the state. The trustees believe in their own omniscience and residents have begun to agree — a belief that brings a smile to agents of the state.

I once asked a candidate for trustee how he would know the correct number of firefighters the township required. Then, I just listened. For almost ten minutes, the candidate noted how he would research and analyze that particular issue once elected. It was obvious that he did not have a clue.[2] Nevertheless, he would act and vote as if he did.

Where volunteers once protected us, we now have unionized firefighters and associated bureaucrats. The fire department expands based on studies and research, not on any market-based analysis, balancing very personal benefits with very personal risks.

The trustees and bureaucrats plan the future based on the science of the day. They act as if they were the intended recipients of a letter written by Claude-Henri Saint-Simon some 200 years ago. In that letter, Saint-Simon envisioned a paradise governed by "men of genius." That was his utopia. Of course, history reveals a different reality.

There is a temptation to believe the state must accompany a complex society on the journey into tomorrow. Fight the temptation. Only acting men and women with their own property at stake can be trusted to make efficient decisions and bring about a tomorrow that is better than today.

And if we must have government, let it remain small and insignificant, spending its time cutting ribbons and bickering over nonsense like the color of street signs. Let the rest of us enjoy the freedom to pursue our own happiness.

Notes
[1] Amazingly, the trustees of a bordering township rejected a proposal to force one refuse company on its residents. They said that if residents want to negotiate contracts, they could organize themselves and negotiate without the interference of government. A ray of hope in a sometimes gray world, indeed.
[2] I also do not know the correct number of firefighters. And neither does anyone without a profit line.





Monday, June 29, 2009

 

Great Place for Summer Fun

Where's a great place for summer fun? Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp and Resort in Mill Run, Pa.

Nestled in the Mill Run valley, between the Chestnut and Laurel ridges of Southwestern Pennsylvania, this park is a great place to spend time with the family.


Besides the campground, there are the outdoor activities down in Ohiopyle, including a waterfall and natural water slide.

Of course, there are the mountains to ride.

A beautiful area, indeed.

Friday, June 26, 2009

 

The Delaware County Political Reporter

For a couple of years now, the Delaware County Political Reporter has been going after Republican officeholders and wannabes. The Reporter has been all over any comment, action, or decision that had even a slight odor.

As an example: Not too long ago, the Reporter caught Hanks making some strange campaign contributions (see below). But, now ...

The Reporter is on the side of the two of the commissioners and ST eGe -- Delaware, LLC. This in spite of the very questionable vote taken by Tweedledee and Tweedledum.


How did the Reporter gain such an affinity for Tweedledee (Hanks) over such a short time? Could the Reporter have some connection to the stink in Delaware? I wonder.



From the Delaware County Political Reporter:

Todd Hanks, in support of his “buddy” Jordan, funded Jordan’s plan against longtime members of Central Committee by using $6,000.00 he pirated out of his auditor campaign fund that he converted to his “Todd Hanks for Central Committee” fund. No campaign reporting is required for central committee races – Hanks found a new way to steal! We acknowledge that Hanks won his Central Committee race; however, he never had a challenger. Hanks won’t be on the ballot again until 2010, but has received Party funds in the past and continually has fund raisers for himself while endorsed candidates are trying to beat Democrats (and who need the limited money available from contributors today). Hanks is the leading contender to claim Jordan’s office – if he wins. (see the tax trouble situation in "Brenner.")

Thursday, June 25, 2009

 

What a deal for Delaware County

Consider this: I conceive of a new way to seal asphalt. I apply for, and receive, a patent for my idea. I then contact my local county commissioners, with patent and return-on-investment model in hand, and ask for $3.1 million so that I can test to see if my concept works. Interesting.

I expect the county to bet tax dollars on some concept I dreamed up. Does that even make sense?

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

 

Jim Camp gives the two most important minutes of his life

Camp (of ST eGe -- Delaware, LLC) loves his grandchildren so much that he is willing to accept a $3.1 million contract. That's real love. The man has a big heart ... And, with the love of Hanks and Thompson, a big wallet.

With Jim, anything is possible!


note: the Camp-y presentation begins around 8:15. Count the use of "possibly" in his presentation.

Monday, June 22, 2009

 

$100 million per year over 100 years

$100 million per year for 100 years. Amazing.

Then there are the 3,000 jobs generated by a facility. 3,000?

Hey, they have the model. Does anyone believe them?

 

Todd Hank and Tommy Thompson: Real class acts

Hanks and Thompson are so proud of the contract they approved that they wanted to just slip it past the public. You see, those two are real class acts. They do not need accolades for their hard work. Nope. They would rather just pass those $3.1 million contracts without discussion.

O'Brien, on the other hand, asks too many questions. Doesn't he realize that commissioners are not supposed to bring attention to such expenditures? Commissioners are just supposed to negotiate out of slight and then approve the contract unnoticed. It's all about friends and allies.

Hanks may think his cat and mouse act is cute during the meetings, but it is so obvious from the video that he is no Bill Clinton. Hanks is hiding something. Something big.

Thompson plays the good old boy -- the country boy politician. But old Tommy's a real snake in the county. Watch his nonsense when he replies to direct questions and you will see a true backroom deal maker.

Seems like the real excrementitous discharge occupies the two seats to O'Brien' s right.

O'Brien, Make sure you wash your hands after every meeting. You never know what you may have touched.

Saturday, June 20, 2009

 

Hanks and Thompson: Thumbing their noses at the Ohio Constitution

What are Hanks and Thompson up to? What is so secretive that it cannot withstand a little sunshine? Could it be an illegal investment scheme? But how do Tweedledee and Tweedledum benefit. Hmmm. I wonder.

note: If you want a copy of the contract, post your email (I won't publish it) and I'll send the contract to you.

From the Ohio Constitution

8.06 - Counties, cities, towns, or townships, not authorized to become stockholders, etc.; insurance, etc

Counties, cities, towns, or townships, not authorized to become stockholders, etc.; insurance, etc. http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/constitution.cfm?Part=8&Section=06

No laws shall be passed authorizing any county, city, town or township, by vote of its citizens, or otherwise, to become a stockholder in any joint stock company, corporation, or association whatever; or to raise money for, or to loan its credit to, or in aid of, any such company, corporation, or association: provided, that nothing in this section shall prevent the insuring
of public buildings or property in mutual insurance associations or companies. Laws may be passed providing for the ...

Friday, June 19, 2009

 

Todd Hanks and Tommy Thompson: They seem a little nervous in the sunshine

Check out the link to see something odd at the county commissioners meeting. The majority of the commissioners try to sneak through a $3 million contract. Who will receive the contract? A company that doesn't even exist today.

Todd and Tommy, What's going on here? Who's pulling your strings?

Your Republican Party in action.

Thursday, June 18, 2009

 

A Nation of Ratfinks

Sometimes "they" are your neighbors. -- Jim

The following article was published by The Ludwig von Mises Institute in the not too distant past.



A Nation of Ratfinks
by Jim Fedako

Ludwig von Mises: "A free man must be able to endure it when his fellow men act and live otherwise than he considers proper. He must free himself from the habit, just as soon as something does not please him, of calling for the police."



Totalitarianism used to be the product of the Hitlers and Stalins of the world, but your neighbors are beginning to grasp the power of a centralized government that exists exclusively to metastasize its evils throughout every human endeavor — a government that never sleeps and is always ready to put its nose into anyone's business. Just give the feds a call, they're ready and willing to assist with any effort that increases their power and influence. 24/7.

Are your children whining over carrots in their school lunch bag? Are you tired of hearing that Mr. and Mrs. So-And-So down the street let their children eat Ho-Hos and Ding-Dongs for lunch? Does the local school cafeteria serve chocolate chip cookies to anyone with 50 cents to spare?

If the answer is yes, what do you do? Do you take control of your own family and lay down the laws of the household? Or do you blame this whole situation on those of the ilk of your neighbors, the So-And-Sos?

Taking control may cause some hard feelings for a few days, maybe even a week or two, but blaming the So-And-Sos gets you off the hook right away. See, if only the So-And-Sos joined you in your health crusade, your children would be forced to join; you know peer pressure and all of that. You hit the first bump in your road toward the Progressive Utopia when you realize that the So-And-Sos living down the street are not really that friendly with you and are unwilling to follow your marching orders. Ok, next option.

How about your best friend? He agrees that Ho-Hos are the devil's fruit but he's not certain about the Ding-Dongs; they do taste good with a tall glass of cold milk.

Your crusade just isn't working and your kids are still crying about their friend Johnny's lunch snacks.

How about petitioning the local school board? Ask them to ban all unhealthy foods — at least those foods that you deem unhealthy. What is to be considered unhealthy is simply those foods that you don't want your children to eat.

Alright, the list of foods has been defined, but how to get the school board to agree. Go to a meeting and call them all uncaring hypocrites. How can they sleep at night after claiming that they want the best for children all the while knowing that little Johnny crinkles the snack wrapper at lunch — in the school's cafeteria nonetheless?

Those crusty yahoos on the school board don't even smile as you speak, they've got their own agenda to push. Those who struggle with their own parenting somehow become omniscient once elected to a school board or hired as an administrator. Sure they pray that their own efforts will result in happy, health offspring, but they will not let that stop them from becoming the uber-parent of all who attend the local schools. Omniscient and
omnipotent? Certainly. Free and compulsory? Absolutely. Interested in this specific agenda issue? Sorry, no.

A brick wall. Your crusade has stopped. Well, for a minute or two anyway. Then the idea hits; call your state representative. Put the pressure on him. Tell him that you are a strong party member who wants the best for all children. Doesn't he realize that a health crisis exists? Children are dying. Yes, dying. Not just those eating the snacks but also those experiencing the secondhand affects of snack attack. They are bound to suffer a lifetime of pre-snack-desire syndrome.

Your representative listens politely on the phone but really doesn't sound interested in tilting at this windmill. Come on now, there are more pressing concerns that can be used to further the interventionist agenda. This just isn't one of them.

So you are an unsatisfied constituent. Not to fear, you do have a congressman who delights in media coverage. He smells front page because the local paper likes to write about any Don Quixote who tilts for the masses. You've got the hook, time to land the fish. He'll gladly support your efforts because children are dying; it's all right there in the latest research by the Americans Against Unhealthy Foods Institute.

The congressman takes up the banner and enlists a eager bureaucrat in the Department of Health and Human Services to help craft the bill. This bureaucrat wants to make a name for himself. Sure he sneaks the odd Hostess cake at the gas station, but a statist career awaits him.

It is election time and enough House members are looking for the headline and public poll spike, and children are always a winner. Before you can find you way through the cellophane wrapper of a Twinkie, your bill is signed into law and now no one can serve their children snacks deemed unhealthy by a coalition of farmers, health food store owners, bureaucrats, and sundry statist do-gooders.

No longer can the school birthday party include cupcakes with icing. A vegetable tray with low fat dressing has to be served beneath the poster of Mr. Carrot and Ms. Broccoli stomping the Rat Snack.

Sounds unbelievable? Well it's real, and it is fast becoming the American Way.
I've seen a parent who was shocked that the average student in the local schools eats 10 candy bars at lunch during the school year. Can you believe that? Ten candy bars a year. Certainly she is correct in calling this a travesty and a crisis; the papers agreed with her. She soon caught the ear of state officials, for a while anyway. A bill was kicked around but the enthusiasm quickly waned. Bills like this never really go away though, they all return in a modified form when the timing is better.

The woman's crusade did not catch the current fancy of local and state officials but she is lucky enough to have a congressman who saw fit to work with FEMA so that three homes in Columbus, Ohio could be declared a disaster area due to minor land subsidence.
[1] I fully expect her to be heard in Washington and the big paws of central government will find their way into all school lunch bags and boxes.

That neighborhood crank that we all try to avoid will most likely be testifying before a House committee about the health crisis she perceives to be affecting her neighborhood and the nation. You pay her no mind, at least until she receives a pen from the President at the signing of the Unhealthy Snack Food Act, to be known as Our Children Come First Initiative. Yesterday's crank is now your Gulag commandant.

Consider your options. Don't want to eat at a restaurant that allows smoking? You can either tell the owner that you are leaving because the smoke offends you, or you can work to force an outright ban on smoking. Approaching the owner is uncomfortable, but calling the local office of your congressman is easy. In fact, it will be a positive experience. Trust me, the elected ears want to hear your complaints. The constituent services worker in any congressional office loves these ideas. She'll listen attentively and be willing to work with you. Isn't it all about children, health, etc? No, it's all about
interventionism and coercive power. But in this instance coercion is on your side.

Will your idea withstand judicial review? Certainly. The courts have already declared private property that exists for commercial purposes to be places of public convenience. The judges will have no problem accepting a law that bans smoking in all restaurants and bars. Nor will they consider a ban of Snickers in the lunch bag a violation of personal property rights.

You'll also be on the side of externalities and econometrics. Studies will appear that banning snacks in the school lunch bag will result in an annual x% increase in the local and national economies.

Don't believe them? Prove them wrong, or at least try to prove them wrong. You will find that their arguments morph as fast as those from a cornered Keynesian. Every time you think they're pinned, a new argument will wrestle itself free. No matter that each new argument refutes a prior one.
Polylogism is the name of the game and logic for some ebbs and flows like tides in the Bay of Fundy.

The
National Bureau of Economic Research will host conflicting correlative studies that not only contradict each other but stand outside of a priori logic. With conflict and contradiction comes a new government panel or commission, or both. Something has to give, and that something is your liberty.

I have to admit that prior to reading
Critique of Interventionism, my first book by Ludwig von Mises, I was apt to vacillate with the argument of the times. Fighting against the statists and their supposed concerns for children and the general heath and welfare are tough without strong backing. After reading that book, along with Human Action, Bureaucracy, and the Rothbard classic, Man, Economy and State, I gained the knowledge to see through the statist haze.

Unlike most schools of economics and philosophy, the Austrian School has stayed true to its beliefs. Mises, a cultured gentleman, did not advocate that all be forced to live as he lived his life. No, he believed that private property was the essence of liberty. He's right!

Now back to my Ding-Dongs and hot chocolate.

Notes:

[1] "Home on North Side Sinking into Ancient Bog: City agrees to spend $570,000 to buy, demolish houses that are in danger," Columbus Dispatch, June 20, 2005


Tuesday, June 16, 2009

 

Mencken, again!

"The aim of public education ... to put down dissent and originality."
"That erroneous assumption is to the effect that the aim of public education is to fill the young of the species with knowledge and awaken their intelligence, and so make them fit to discharge the duties of citizenship in an enlightened and independent manner. Nothing could be further from the truth. The aim of public education is not to spread enlightenment at all, it is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed and train a standardized citizenry, to put down dissent and originality. That is its aim in the United States, whatever the pretensions of politicians, pedagogues and other such mountebanks, and that is its aim everywhere else." -- H. L. Mencken
Courtesy of my friends over at Freedom Watch

 

FFF Again

From recent editions of the Email Update from the Future of Freedom Foundation:

Monday, June 15, 2009
But it happens that, at the same period and amongst the same nations in which men conceive a natural contempt for the rights of private persons, the rights of society at large are naturally extended and consolidated: in other words, men become less attached to private rights just when it is most necessary to retain and defend what little remains of them.

— Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America [1835]


Monday, June 15, 2009

 

They were for certain liberties, then they came into power.

The left was livid as Bush and Cheney trampled over civil liberties. Then they took power.

Amazingly, Obama is about to trump Bush. And no one complains. No one can complain.

Since the issue is ostensively national security, the conservatives can say nothing. And they won't.

Welcome to 1984, twenty-five years late.

Sunday, June 14, 2009

 

Is Democracy for the Demos?

A recent article of mine over on the Blog at Mises.org:








Is Democracy for the Demos?

Jim Fedako





Who benefits from democracy? To believe the standard reply, the masses — the demos — benefit from majority rule. I no longer accept that notion.

I recently finished Étienne de La Boétie's The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude. The book is powerful, indeed. The essence of his argument is that the tyrant rules by the will of the people, as no other means exists for one man to control the fates of millions.
While the whole book is challenging and thought provoking — a truly wonderful read — it was a small section of Part III that pulled me in and launched me on a tangent.

La Boétie notes that the tyrant and his chiefs rarely live out their natural ends. No, they tend to die at the hands of those closest to them. What accounts for this state of affairs? It is the fear that one's supposed allies are real threats — they likely are. And it is this fear that drives the power-seeking toward nighttime adventures and assassinations.

Since power is ever and always intoxicating, is the order of government the issue? While it is true that, as power increases and becomes more centralized, the dagger becomes the likely means to transition from oppressor to oppressor, does it necessarily follow that democracy is a better arrangement?

Democracy has allowed for peaceful transitions from one ruling elite to another (or, between different factions of the same elite). It is likely the most suitable arrangement to transfer power without bloodshed. But what is the benefit of democracy to me, the common man? Is it to celebrate those rare occasions when the majority views the world as I do? For even a tyrant will occasionally rule in my favor.

Democracy is no benefit to those enfranchised. A man may cherish democracy during his time in the majority and worship it when his views are no longer in the majority. But is this freedom? Is liberty nothing more than accepting the majority at all times, under all costs?

Liberty requires the ability to use one's body and property in any manner, as long as those actions do not collide with the liberty of others. And when collisions occur, a judge or arbitrator decides each case based on property rights, and property rights only.

In a democracy, liberty is simply the right to cast a vote for or against an issue or candidate, and then to accept the decision of the majority under threat of the apparatus of coercion and compulsion. Here, in essence, the political die is cast, with the singular vote having no effect. The voter must abide by an outcome even though he disagrees, and will likely lose property and property rights in the end. This arrangement is no different from one where the voter casts a symbolic vote, a vote that remains uncounted, with the outcome predetermined by the whims of the tyrant.

In either situation, the voter must accept the will of someone else. The right to vote, and the right to have that vote counted, changes nothing.

It would appear that democracy benefits the rulers, as democracy alone has provided the most consistent means for those formerly in power to sleep and die in peace.

And the same holds for the courtiers, nomenklatura, and apparatchiks. These sycophants need no longer dread midnight's knife and muffled cries, and the subsequent crowning of a new king. The elite and bureaucracy can retire to their farms and while away their passing years without fear — their riches and posterity intact.

As I see it now, democracy is not to the advantage of the demos, it is to the advantage of the power elite. Something to think about.





Saturday, June 13, 2009

 

Gaming the System

Olentangy once again trumpets its ranking on the Newsweek list of top schools. Let's take a look at the method used to generate the list.

The index is obtained by dividing "the number of Advanced Placement, Intl. Baccalaureate and/or Cambridge tests taken by all students at a school in 2008 divided by the number of graduating seniors." OK. So where's the spin?

In Olentangy, students must pay the $90 test fee when registering for AP classes. Why? The district makes students pay the fee since it wants them to take the test, regardless the result. So, even if a student is expecting a low score, there is a lot of pressure to take the test anyway.

Someone needs to tell the Ohio Board of Regents that simply taking an AP test equals college preparedness. For some reason, OBR believes that Olentangy has a high college remediation rate. Go figure.

Friday, June 12, 2009

 

Favorite Sites

Thanks to fellow bloggers RonMcK at Blessed Economist and Steve Scott at From the Pew for doing the heavy lifting on Christian issues, especially their research on biblical insights in the study of economics.

These two bloggers make it tough to write on Christian topics as they grab hold of their subjects with vigor and polish. Excellent writing. Check them out when you get the chance, you'll learn something and really enjoy yourself.

Note: In addition,
Blessed Economist has an excellent blogroll that links to many other interesting and informative sites. One site of note is KingdomWatcher's series on Christian Economics.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

 

Doing It Again: yes they are

A reader noted this article from The Columbus Dispatch.

There is something wrong with democracy when it pits those who pay taxes against those who consume those very same taxes. And there is something very wrong when the political class fuels this class war.

No matter the justification, this view of democracy is simply the supposedly morally-justified method to rob your neighbor. But theft is always theft.


City income-tax backers woo retirees
Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:08 AM
By
Robert Vitale
THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH

Roberta Johnson says it seems as if the emergency-medical squads reach her Near East Side senior-housing complex within seconds of a call for help.

And an increased police presence around Mount Vernon Plaza makes her neighbors feel safe enough to sit outside again on warm summer nights, she adds.

Johnson, who is 67, thinks older residents place a high value on Columbus city services that officials warn are in danger unless voters approve an income-tax increase Aug. 4.

Yesterday, she helped deliver a message that tax backers hope will win over the high-turnout bloc of voters: Higher taxes won't take a cent out of their pensions or Social Security checks.

Johnson and other supporters of the special-election ballot measure formally kicked off their campaign yesterday outside a Franklinton fire station. Citizens for Strong Neighborhoods and Good Jobs includes neighborhood leaders, labor unions and elected officials.

In addition to making the case for protecting police and fire protection, the supporters emphasized who would -- and wouldn't -- feel the pinch from a tax increase that would cost people an additional $50 for every $10,000 earned. The measure would increase the income-tax rate from 2 percent to 2.5 percent.

"Those who can afford it will pay the most," Johnson said. "Those who are poor will pay the least. For those of us living on pensions, we won't pay anything at all."
Retirees are among a number of groups exempt from Columbus' income tax. Pensions and Social Security aren't subject to the tax, nor are military pay, disability payments and income earned by children.

"They're trying to peel away groups of people," said Heidi Samuel, an East Side resident who started an anti-tax group called Not Right Now. "I don't think for one minute seniors are going to overlook the burden it puts on their neighbors," Samuel said.

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

 

Olentangy School Districts: The Sophists

Dear Editor:

Some 150 years ago, the economist Frédéric Bastiat wrote about the economic sophisms of his day -- a sophism being an argument deliberately formulated to deceive. What Bastiat noted is as true today at it was in his day: Politicians and government officials use sophisms to make claims that, while appearing true, are actually false.

The Olentangy School District has recently added to the list of sophisms. As reported in ThisWeek Olentangy, the district's web site states, "One of the main reasons for revamping the school funding system was to take some of the burden off of the local taxpayer."

That implies there exists some taxpayer who is not local. Can that be so?

All state and local taxes are ultimately paid by the local taxpayer. Shifting the burden from the local taxpayer to the state simply shifts the burden back to the local taxpayer in the form of state sales and income taxes.

While the district sounds like it is running to the taxpayer's defense, it is not. The effort to revamp the school funding system is simply an effort to push the tax burden back to the community under a different label. Nevertheless, a tax is always a tax.

This is true: The district holds the ability to lower the tax burden of its residence. It can reduce its expenditures and reduce its operating millage. All it takes is a vote of the board.

While that action is unlikely, it is likely that the district will continue using sophisms to prepare voters for the next levy. And a levy is coming. They always do.

Tuesday, June 09, 2009

 

The NEA is real tough on its own union

Can you believe the list of draconian rules that NEA's staff union was forced to accept? Such as being fired for habitual drunkenness that affects performance. The NEA certainly runs a tight ship at its own offices. It's no wonder they do such a wonderful job at local government schools.

From the Education Intellegence Agency

4) Contract Hits. Wherein we highlight a contract provision from the current agreement between the National Education Association and its largest staff union. This is Article 17, Section 4, subsection (a):

(a) Progressive discipline shall not be required with regard to the following, which shall constitute just cause for immediate discharge:

i) habitually being under the influence of alcoholic beverages or drugs during working hours to the extent that the employee is unable to perform adequately his/her assigned functions;

ii) theft;

iii) willful falsification of official documents;

iv) gross insubordination, except where compliance would jeopardize the employee's health or safety;

v) unprovoked assault on or threats to an NEA representative or another employee during working hours;

vi) deliberate destruction of the property of NEA or of another employee;

vii) failure to comply with the provisions of Article 27 of this Agreement;

viii) sale or distribution of a controlled substance on the premises of NEA;

ix) deliberate destruction or misappropriation of electronic data or other proprietary information belonging to NEA;

x) deliberate misrepresentation of one's position at NEA for personal benefit or for the purpose of providing false information for the benefit of another; or

xi) aggravated sexual harassment."


 

Mencken Indicts Both Parties

It's true of both parties.
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace in a continual state of alarm (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing them with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them
imaginary."

- H. L. Mencken
Courtesy of my friends over at Freedom Watch

 

The Equity Project

A recent post of mine over on the Blog at Mises.org:









The Equity Project

Jim Fedako



The Equity Project is a new public charter school that has adopted a unique pay scale - the school will pay all teachers a base salary of $125,000 per year. On top of that, teachers can earn up to a $25,000 bonus their first year, plus they qualify for a comprehensive benefits package. In return, teachers agree to take on more hours, certain administrative responsibilities, and classes of 30 students.

While TEP is an interesting experiment, the results will be wanting of any real meaning.

First off, since state and federal dollars fund the school, it is free to the families of the students. Application to the school does not reflect the preferences of parents ranked against alternate choices. The only knowledge one can ascertained is that parents applying to this school desire it more than they desire their local, failing public school.

Then there is the question of performance. Without a profit line, how will we know if the school is successful? Government and the media will judge the school's performance based solely on student scores on government-mandated tests -- not on dollar votes cast by parents.

Finally, there is the use of scarce resources. The school hired a phys-ed teacher who was once the personal trainer of Kobe Bryant (not knowing any more information, I assume the teacher was a trainer in high demand). Other teachers have similar pedigrees (again, I cannot speak to the market value of these folks). For the sake of argument, and accepting the premise that the school only hires the best that $125,000 can buy, I will assume that all of the teachers are highly qualified and in-demand.

Bryant makes like a bazillion dollars because of his skill and fitness on the basketball court. Basketball - like all professional sports - is a sport where the differences (in absolute terms) between the most valuable player and a bench warmer are miniscule. Especially when viewed against the spectrum of everyone who plays basketball. Therefore, anyone who has the knowledge to increase Bryant's performance by (say) even 1% is worth real money.

Who would bid against the market for such a personal trainer, only to have him work in a fifth-grade gym class? If this was a private school, then the answer is someone who wants to satisfy the preferences of certain parents. As this is a government-funded school, the answer is someone who adheres to the Trotskyite belief in the new soviet man.

Putting someone so qualified in a gym class in not an efficient use of scarce resources - it is similar to suggesting that Mises should have spent his years teaching fifth grade social studies instead of writing Human Action, etc.

In the end, since this school is not subject to the market, we will learn nothing from this latest grand experiment in government schools.


Monday, June 08, 2009

 

Keeping a Handle on the Truth

Paul over at SaveHilliardSchools posted this comment:
As I've written before, I'm not against unions in principle. There's no question that unions played a big part in getting worker safety addressed.

But the post WWII boom is over, and we need to recalibrate to a global market. Teachers and cops and firefighters may not think they're competing globally for jobs, but those of us our here in the private sector - the folks who pay the salaries of those unionized public employee - certainly feel that competition.

Things have to change.
This is an issue of epistemology that has troubled humanity for ages. Are truths immutable? Or can truths change.

The followers of Karl Marx and the adherents of the teaching of the
German Historical School do not believe in immutable truths. For the Marxian, truth is subject to material dialectics. For the historicist, truth depends on time and place.

In the Austrian school of economics thought, truths are immutable -- unchanging and ever-present. The Austrians are unique in their belief that truths are logically deducted from axioms that are themselves true and unchanging.

Paul's comment shows an acceptance of historicism -- he believe that truths about unions changes with time and circumstance. Paul appears to admit that unions have no place in modern society while, at the same time, he claims that unions served an essential purpose in our no-too-district past.

I will assume that Paul has confined himself to pro-union history texts. Otherwise, he would recognize that unions exist for one reason: To better the position of union members over all others, including members of all other unions.

More importantly, Paul should recognize that a truth is a truth, today as much as yesterday.

Sunday, June 07, 2009

 

Seeing Two Different Worlds: and only one reality


Some folks see the world through eyes clouded by the warmth of government employment. Below is a standard reply to my previous post:
In general, I would say most teachers agree with that sentiment. I know few teachers who complain about pay. They chose the work they do and they know that just because a kid fresh from an MBA program can pull down a six-figure salary in his/her 20's while most teachers work 30 years and often don't reach that figure with the same amount of education, they are okay with it. It comes with the territory. I know a lot of teachers who just wish the state would fix the funding system so they wouldn't have to rely on taxes (teachers pay them, too).

When they say it's about the kids, they are talking about making sure high-quality teachers are in the classroom-- that usually translates to making sure salaries are competitive. Any district's payroll usually takes the lion's share of the budget. It is a people-intensive business.
This has to be a post from someone living on a government salary. There is no other way to explain why the writer believes that individual life decisions are subject to absolute guarantees.

The writer presumes a world where anyone seeking an MBA can obtain one. And that everyone with an MBA has a job and makes a six-figure salary, starting from their 20's. Huh? Who would even make such a claim? Someone with a guaranteed salary and lifetime employment, of course. And who has a guaranteed salary and lifetime employment? A government employee.

The writer equates a masters in education with an MBA, as if the market values both the same. But that is not the case. In fact, there are no market alternatives for the holder of a masters in education -- only government schools value a masters in education.[1] And even government schools are not in the market for teachers with 10 years of experience, regardless of the masters degree.

The next proposition is equally as nonsensical: That teachers pay taxes. Teachers, as government employees, are, on net, tax recipients -- they receive more taxes than they pay. For teachers, the mode of taxation is of no consequence. In all cases they win out -- in all cases their salary is paid at the expense of their neighbor's productive employment.

Of course, teachers want the state to fund government schools. Why? Teachers believe that such a system will benefit them over the current system -- a system based on, for the most part, locally-voted property taxes.

It's all about the kids. Really? Am I to believe that teachers are so altruistic that they fight for higher salaries to benefit the students -- that they are forced to take higher salaries so that new teachers will enter the teaching field.

Finally, the high quality teacher defense is over the top. Given that it is the teachers themselves who fight for guaranteed employment for all teachers, no matter how lousy.

Watch the John Stossel video (above) exposing teachers defending the current system. And then tell me it's all about the kids.

Notes:

[1] I know, some private companies do value a masters in education. But these companies are the pilot fish of the government school sharks.

Saturday, June 06, 2009

 

The Issue

OK, so here’s my issue:

In a previous post, I stated, “Well, Wade-O connived a superintendent salary that is 2.5 times the amount funded by the state -- in his mind, his overly inflated salary is ‘the right thing for [the] students.’”

Some folks say that it was OK for Wade to negotiate with his family in mind – to play the board in order to receive the highest salary possible.

I do not disagree that a man has to consider his family when making decisions. [1] My issue is that he negotiated for himself and his family and now has the nerve to turn around and claim he always does “the right thing for our students and for our taxpayers.”

No. Wade does the right thing for himself, the very same course taken by administrators, teachers, etc. It’s all done for their benefit, and their benefit alone. [2]

Yet, at levy time, all of a sudden, it’s all for the kids – and the taxpayers.

Very disingenuous, to say the least.

I don’t like school employees taking me for a fool as they lift dollars from my wallet. And I do not like a board that does not recognize it represents the taxpayers, not the school employees.

Note:

[1] Keep in mind that if Wade was willing to play the board, he is also willing to play the community.
[2] That is not to say the rest of us are any different. Of course, I do not attempt to force my neighbors to pay for that which benefits me.

Friday, June 05, 2009

 

The End of the Republic: Socialized Healthcare

What is the Rubicon that divides freedom from servitude? According to David Zanotti of the American Policy Roundtable, it’s healthcare. And he has a point.

To hear Zanotti tell it – and the man is passionate about this subject, resistance to the growing state ends once government holds the power of life and death. Once government allocates healthcare, based on its arbitrary whims and fancies, this nation will fall in line – it will have to.

Consider this situation: Your bible study was shut down due to the lack of a city permit. You want to express your offense. And you want express it loud and clear. But your daughter is ill. Do you speak the Truth knowing that your words may offend some official who has the power to deny the healthcare your child so desperately needs? Would you speak? Could you speak?

Does that sound farfetched? Just for a moment, consider acquaintances who send their children to public schools. How many of them are willing to upset the status quo? And this is true even though the parents are free to remove their children from those very same schools. If a parent fears the lowly teacher and principal, with his child’s life on the line, how much more will he fear the vindictive bureaucrat charged with allocating scarce healthcare?

Yes, it is true that state can intrude on my life and property. It can harass and arrest me for no reason whatsoever. However, currently, anyway, it cannot deny healthcare to my children as long as I am able obtain the necessary funds.

Zanotti believes this will all change if our nation succumbs to the material dialectic of socialized medicine – the Fabian approach of gradual political change. He is convinced government will not force socialization in one swift move. It will not attempt to shove socialized medicine down our throats, only to have the nation regurgitate it as before. No, the state will deliver socialized medicine in measured doses, slowly poisoning our health and our freedom.

Two thing are forgotten in the debate: One, just like all services and commodities, healthcare is scarce – scarce in that more is demanded than can be supplied at a price of $0. That should not be surprising. However, for most Americans, it is.

Price is a factor in healthcare, as it must be. Luckily, as demand sends prices and profits soaring, new providers and producers enter the field. Well, that is true in the unregulated market, but it is not so true for healthcare. Nevertheless, the solution to current regulations is not more regulations – or total government control of healthcare. The answer is less government and more freedom.

The second forgotten issue is the influence of government on our current system. As it stands, the price of healthcare is inflated due to such interventions as state licensing of healthcare providers. To hear some tell it, without government, and government licensure requirements, quality will quickly go south. Bunk.

I favor a completely deregulated system. I say let the market decide who can practice medicine, just as the market decides who replaces the brakes on my car. In the end, under a free market, prices will fall and quality will rise. That is the function of the free market, and it is something that only the free market can provide.

Whom should we entrust with our health – with our lives? Should we entrust it to government, which sees healthcare as a cost; a cost to be allocated to those favored by the state and withdrawn from those not favor? Or should we entrust it to the current, highly regulated system where healthcare is both a cost and a potential avenue for profit? Or should we entrust it to the free market, with unregulated healthcare providers and producers working to profit by ensuring patient satisfaction?

The answer should be obvious, but it is not. And because many Americans cannot see the ills of governmental interventions in the market, they assume the need for government involvement in healthcare. This mind set creates the fertile intellectual field for Fabian seeds that turn a hampered market into one controlled completely by the state.

If the state grabs this next foothold over the Rubicon, the Republic truly becomes the empire. And the likelihood of liberty’s return is greatly diminished.

While Zanotti travels about, spreading the word, he is not simply crying out in the wilderness. Folks are beginning to awaken to the reality that government healthcare is not of the people. It is of the state. And it will be a hefty yoke to bear.


Thursday, June 04, 2009

 

Playing Mancala after the Knock on the Door

As a child, I was told a story in Sunday school for which I can find no corroboration. It is likely my memory which is at issue. Regardless, I will tell the story as I remember it.

The early Christians were persecuted by agents of the Roman Empire. Despite the dangers, these Christians would defy law and assemble at a home to read and minister the Word.


Whenever someone knocked on the door in an unfamiliar manner, the Christians would quickly set up Mancala --a popular game at the time -- and pretend to be engaged in friendly competition. The door would be opened with no hint to the world of the real intent of the meeting.

We know the early Church was persecuted, that is fact. The use of Mancala as the ruse is questionable -- or, at least, I can find no corroborating evidence to back up my story. Nevertheless, the story stands as good example of what life in the US may be like in the not-too-distant future.

Just a couple of days ago, I blogged this story, "Couple Ordered to Stop Holding Bible Study at Home Without Permit." The city did pull back under pressure, but it never admitted its agents were at fault.

My question: How long until Christians in this country are threatened by real laws, laws that attempt to silence God's Word? How long until Isaiah's remnant is forced to learn Mancala as cover from agents of the state? How long?


Note: We have the game at home, so we are ready.

Wednesday, June 03, 2009

 

Note the publication date

Of course, Mises was correct 87 years ago. And his insights are correct today.

Who's supporting your intellectual battle? Is it the Republicans who simply want a return to their version of socialism? Is it the Obama Democrats who seek to fulfill the dreams of Karl Marx?

Try the Mises Institute, LewRockwell.com, the Future of Freedom Foundation, or the Foundation for Economic Education. These sites will prepare you so that you can "thrust [yourself] vigorously into the intellectual battle."

From a recent edition of the Email Update from the Future of Freedom Foundation:


Tuesday, June 2, 2009
No one can find a safe way out for himself if society is sweeping towards destruction. Therefore everyone, in his own interests, must thrust himself vigorously into the intellectual battle. None can stand aside with unconcern; the interests of everyone hang on the result. Whether he chooses or not, every man is drawn into the great historical struggle, the decisive battle into which our epoch has plunged us.
— Ludwig von Mises, Socialism [1922]


Tuesday, June 02, 2009

 

Carver Governance spun on its head

The Carver Governance Model requires a strong, focused board. If the board will not hold its superintendent and treasurer accountable, the fault lies with the board, not the governance model.

Two things to consider:

One (from the mainstream point of view) -- Under Carver, the board sets hard and fast goals for the superintendent and treasurer. The board then allows its two chief administrators to work toward those goals based on the boundaries set in board policy. The board then evaluates them against those goals.

Remember, if the board says, "Hire Joe to coach the football team," it can't turn around and hold the superintendent accountable for the team's record. But if the board says, "Deliver a winning team," and allows the superintendent to hire the coach, the board can then hold the superintendent accountable for the team's record.

The same logic applies to educational programs and finances.

But most boards (Olentangy and Columbus included) are weak -- they are nothing more than cheerleaders for the administration (in fact, that is Columbus board policy). So, Carver ends up being the club which the majority of the board wields against any member who desires to hold the district's chief administrators accountable.

This process is called triangulation: Where you adopt a program favored by your opponent, but use it against them.

You see, the majority embraces Carver, not as a means to hold the superintendent and treasurer accountable, but to defend the administration against those who seek accountability. A Clintonesque spin.

Two (from point of view of the Austrian school of economic thought) -- No organization can set meaningful goals for a government agency. It is simply impossible. So all that work in One (above) is just a chasing after the wind.

Keep in mind that no one -- and no organized body -- is omniscient enough to quantify and qualify the desires of any community, no matter how large or small the community. The same holds for allocating scarce resources against competing wants. No one -- and no organized body -- can do it. (Oh, McFerson is convinced he is that sufficiently omniscient, but it appears that Franklin County, the state, and the taxpayers are going to end up buying his mess).


note: Of course, the Austrian view is the correct one.

Monday, June 01, 2009

 

Sara Marie Brenner: A Persecution Complex

"She cares too much about the City of Powell and good government in general to let them get away with it."

She's talking about a seat on Powell City Council, for crying out loud.

The best part is her claim that "bickering and back-stabbing has to stop." This while she is bickering and back-stabbing.

Thankfully, I can "send a clear message to those trying to undermine [her] campaign" by opening my wallet. How magnanimous?

People like this scare me. Can you image how she will act once given minor powers?

Note: Brenner asks, "Why are blogs attacking [me]?" Because it's politics. And because you are doing the same.



From an email I received (unsolicited) from the Brenner campaign:

Friends of Sara Marie Brenner
Sara Marie Brenner for Powell City Council in '09

Why Are Blogs Attacking Sara Marie Brenner?

Since the May 26th announcement, those against conservative fiscal policy and good government have already begun attacking Sara Marie Brenner. Yes, for a City Council race, people are already in attack mode! Various blogs and individuals are making up hateful lies just to try to make you think that Sara is something she's not. She cares too much about the City of Powell and good government in general to let them get away with it. Sara supports transparency and truth, and she will be happy to combat the lies that come out about her all through this campaign.

Show these people that you support Sara Marie Brenner by making an
online donation to support Sara's campaign for Powell City Council. What a way to say "thank you" to the people who are posting the hateful lies!

So, let's get the record straight about the Delaware County Political Reporter blog, Topix blog, and other blogs out there that just like to spew hatred. First of all, they are all anonymous. While we have a pretty good idea of who it is, the people behind them don't come out and announce who they are or provide any proof. If they're so right, why don't they make themselves public and provide the proof? If Sara has something to say, she'll make sure you know she's the one saying it.

The Delaware County Political Reporter blog went through several of the people on Sara's campaign web site and attacked them individually, as well, just to try to scare them into retracting their endorsements. Are we going to let these people get away with these kinds of tactics? Fight against the dirty tactics of coercion and hatred by
supporting Sara Marie Brenner for Powell City Council.

In addition, one of our county-wide elected officials to whom Sara sent an email asking for support posted the email on a blog, saying that they were "speechless" about receiving the email. Is this person that unconcerned about the job they were elected to do that they have time to contribute to a blog? As Powell City Councilwoman, Sara will be above politics and the 'cat and mouse games' that go on behind the scenes. Sara believes we all need to work together, especially in these times, to get things done for our constituents! The bickering and back-stabbing has to stop - it's a waste of time and resources for everyone.

A blog has also made a comment regarding Sara's support of keeping the Powell Chamber of Commerce separate from the Delaware Area Chamber of Commerce when the proposed merger was being discussed. Somehow, the blogs think that this means Sara doesn't support actually working together. To the contrary! Chambers of Commerce can partner in many ways, but that doesn't mean that they have to officially merge. The merger wasn't necessary, and it was best for Powell at the time, and continues to be best for Powell, for there to be a separate Chamber of Commerce supporting Powell's many businesses. Blogs' claims that this is "contradictory" is nothing but a far-fetched falsehood.

And now, the Delaware County Political Reporter blog is claiming that Sara's husband, Delaware County Recorder &
Legislative Candidate Andrew Brenner, is "laundering" money through Sara's company for his campaign. We ask, prove it! When the campaign finance reports are filed, the world will be able to see that this is another lie attempted to demean to two public servants who have the best interests of the citizens at heart. The Brenners are working and will work hard to protect taxpayers dollars.

All of these blog claims are false and baseless, and written by Sara's opponents who don't want for she or her husband to be successful public servants. Just as Andrew has been able to cut his own budget while in office, Sara supports fiscal conservativism, as well, and looks forward to bringing those principals to the City of Powell. She can't help it if her opponents want the status quo of lawsuits, voters feeling they aren't being heard and bickering between the township and city.
Help Sara Marie Brenner stop the lawsuits, keep taxes low, listen to constituents, work to better handle traffic and congestion, and move forward with balanced growth and development!

To combat these groups and individuals, Sara Marie Brenner will need the campaign funds for mailers, yard signs, literature pieces and other necessary materials to get the word out about her positive campaign.
Please make a secure online donation and support her campaign!

We will continue to refute the false claims we find. For more information on Sara Marie Brenner, please visit www.SaraMarieBrenner.com and you are always welcome to contact the campaign. We will be happy to answer any questions you have about Sara, Andrew or the campaign at any time. Just call or email!

Together, we will send a clear message to those trying to undermine Sara Marie Brenner's campaign.

Friends of Sara Marie Brenner


Sunday, May 31, 2009

 

Pravda is Now the Voice of Truth

Pravda tells the truth, and Russia may be freer than us. HT LewRockwell.com:





American Capitalism Gone With a Whimper
by Stanislav Mishin


This article originally appeared in Pravda. It is reprinted with the permission of the author.


It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American descent into Marxism is happening with breathtaking speed, against the backdrop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people.

True, the situation has been well prepared on and off for the past century, especially the past twenty years. The initial testing grounds was conducted upon our Holy Russia and a bloody test it was. But we Russians would not just roll over and give up our freedoms and our souls, no matter how much money Wall Street poured into the fists of the Marxists.

Those lessons were taken and used to properly prepare the American populace for the surrender of their freedoms and souls, to the whims of their elites and betters.

First, the population was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard education system based on pop culture, rather then the classics. Americans know more about their favorite TV dramas then the drama in DC that directly affects their lives. They care more for their "right" to choke down a McDonalds burger or a BurgerKing burger than for their constitutional rights. Then they turn around and lecture us about our rights and about our "democracy". Pride blinds the foolish.

Then their faith in God was destroyed, until their churches, all tens of thousands of different "branches and denominations" were for the most part little more then Sunday circuses and their televangelists and top protestant mega-preachers were more then happy to sell out their souls and flocks to be on the "winning" side of one pseudo-Marxist politician or another. Their flocks may complain, but when explained that they would be on the "winning" side, their flocks were ever so quick to reject Christ in hopes for earthly power. Even our Holy Orthodox churches are scandalously liberalized in America.

The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama. His speed in the past three months has been truly impressive. His spending and money printing has been record setting, not just in America's short history but in the world. If this keeps up for more then another year, and there is no sign that it will not, America at best will resemble the Weimar Republic and at worst Zimbabwe.

These past two weeks have been the most breathtaking of all. First came the announcement of a planned redesign of the American Byzantine tax system, by the very thieves who used it to bankroll their thefts, loses and swindles of hundreds of billions of dollars. These make our Russian oligarchs look little more then ordinary street thugs, in comparison. Yes, the Americans have beaten our own thieves in the shear volumes. Should we congratulate them?

These men, of course, are not an elected panel but made up of appointees picked from the very financial oligarchs and their henchmen who are now gorging themselves on trillions of American dollars, in one bailout after another. They are also usurping the rights, duties and powers of the American congress (parliament). Again, congress has put up little more then a whimper to their masters.

Then came Barack Obama's command that GM's (General Motors) president step down from leadership of his company. That is correct, dear reader, in the land of "pure" free markets, the American president now has the power, the self-given power, to fire CEOs and we can assume other employees of private companies, at will. Come hither, go dither, the centurion commands his minions.

So it should be no surprise, that the American president has followed this up with a "bold" move of declaring that he and another group of unelected, chosen stooges will now redesign the entire automotive industry and will even be the guarantee of automobile policies. I am sure that if given the chance, they would happily try and redesign it for the whole of the world, too. Prime Minister Putin, less then two months ago, warned Obama and UK's Blair, not to follow the path to Marxism, it only leads to disaster. Apparently, even though we suffered 70 years of this Western-sponsored horror show, we know nothing, as foolish, drunken Russians, so let our "wise" Anglo-Saxon fools find out the folly of their own pride.

Again, the American public has taken this with barely a whimper...but a "freeman" whimper.

So, should it be any surprise to discover that the Democratically controlled Congress of America is working on passing a new regulation that would give the American Treasury department the power to set "fair" maximum salaries, evaluate performance and control how private companies give out pay raises and bonuses? Senator Barney Franks, has led this effort. He stresses that this only affects companies that receive government monies, but it is retroactive and taken to a logical extreme, this would include any company or industry that has ever received a tax break or incentive.

The Russian owners of American companies and industries should look thoughtfully at this and the option of closing their facilities down and fleeing the land of the Red as fast as possible. In other words, divest while there is still value left.

The proud American will go down into his slavery with out a fight, beating his chest and proclaiming to the world, how free he really is. The world will only snicker.

May 18, 2009

Stanislav Mishin writes for the blog Mat Rodina.

Copyright © 2009 Stanislav Mishin
(Editor: This article was abridged)



Saturday, May 30, 2009

 

It Could Never Happen in the US

Wanna bet?

Where is the outrage? Are we all just sheeple?

From
FoxNew.com (HT LewRockwell.com):

Couple Ordered to Stop Holding Bible Study at Home Without Permit
Thursday, May 28, 2009

Pastor David Jones and his wife Mary have been told that they cannot invite friends to their San Diego, Calif. home for a Bible study — unless they are willing to pay tens of thousands of dollars to San Diego County.

"On Good Friday we had an employee from San Diego County come to our house, and inform us that the Bible study that we were having was a religious assembly, and in violation of the code in the county." David Jones told FOX News.

"We told them this is not really a religious assembly — this is just a Bible study with friends. We have a meal, we pray, that was all," Jones said.

A few days later, the couple received a written warning that cited "unlawful use of land," ordering them to either "stop religious assembly or apply for a major use permit," the couple's attorney Dean Broyles told San Diego news station 10News.

But the major use permit could cost the Jones' thousands of dollars just to have a few friends over.

For David and Mary Jones, it's about more than a question of money.

"The government may not prohibit the free exercise of religion," Broyles told FOX News. "I believe that our Founding Fathers would roll over in their grave if they saw that here in the year 2009, a pastor and his wife are being told that they cannot hold a simple Bible study in their own home."

"The implications are great because it’s not only us that’s involved," Mary Jones said. "There are thousands and thousands of Bible studies that are held all across the country. What we’re interested in is setting a precedent here — before it goes any further — and that we have it settled for the future."

The couple is planning to dispute the county's order this week.

If San Diego County refuses to allow the pastor and his wife to continue gathering without acquiring a permit, they will consider a lawsuit in federal court.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?