You're ducking the question. Do you believe the flawed resolution would not have otherwise been addressed?
Do you think it is better to keep the levy off the ballot because of a technicality rather than allow your community to have the debate?
Do you have so little faith in the people of your community that you believe they will make the wrong decision if this levy is put up for a vote?
Paul forgets that the representatives of the community voted on the issue -- the vote was 3-2 for the levy. That a 3-2 vote is not sufficient to pass an permanent operating levy in not a "technicality." It is state law.
Is Paul really stating that the two Olentangy board members only voted against the levy because they believed the issue would pass over their "no" votes?
What does that say about integrity on school boards?
Seems Paul sees little integrity on the Olentangy board. Is Hilliard any different? One wonders.