Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Feasel’s follies

A board president who doesn’t know the number of votes needed to pass board action items. Amazing. Did she forget to pull out her handy-dandy Ohio School Boards Association voting cheat sheet? Or is the desire to cheerlead the next levy simply too overwhelming?

The beauty of the vote is that not only was Feasel flawed, but so were the other former board presidents in the room (can you name them?), as well as the superintendent and treasurer (who, by the way, is the board secretary and parliamentarian).

Note: You got to wonder what else is going on at the board and district.


Anonymous said...

Good ol' RINO Scott Galloway to the rescue!

In less than one week Scott went from anti 7.9M levy to pro 7.9M levy so it would pass. It seems he would rather revert to his true colors so the taxes increase than play the political "I'm a fiscal conservative and a Republican" card so he can score his next political position in the Republican Party.

That guy has got to go!

Paul said...

What do you think would have happened had I not sent that note to Julie Feasel?

Jim Fedako said...

You would have minded your own business. But you knew that already.

Paul said...

You're ducking the question. Do you believe the flawed resolution would not have otherwise been addressed?

Do you think it is better to keep the levy off the ballot because of a technicality rather than allow your community to have the debate?

Do you have so little faith in the people of your community that you believe they will make the wrong decision if this levy is put up for a vote?

Anonymous said...

A little "silence of the lambert" would be much appreciated.

"I'll eat your millage with some fava beans and a nice chianti" (then get a groove on with my red iPod Shuffle!).

Paul--really--pick a side and stay there. This isn't a "complex" or "nuanced" issue. It's black and white.

Anonymous said...

Lambert: "What do you think would have happened had I not sent that note to Julie Feasel?"

A.) There would have been a good chance that that most exotic of board room phenomena--the fait accompli that never became--would have resulted in $1,000 staying in my pocket next year. You're a real pal (schmuck).

B.) Your nose would not be covered in all of that gooey brown stuff (ewwwww).

Paul: you are obviously attempting to position yourself to become a sort of Yoda to the region's "better" districts. A vaulted "voice of reason" who will seamlessly straddle both sides of an issue, and be a friend (and mentor) to both sides. Why don't I see you trolling the SWCS boards or strings involving "lesser" districts?. Surely, Columbus, SWCS, Pickerington and other boards and communities would benefit from your unsolicited help. Is it lack of prestige?

C'mon Paul--let us in on your marketing plan.